New screening questions in US non-immigrant visa interviews aim to curb asylum misuse but raise legal and humanitarian concerns.
A subtle yet potentially decisive shift in US visa policy is drawing global attention, as new interview questions could determine the fate of millions of applicants seeking entry into the United States.
Under updated guidelines introduced by the U.S. Department of State, all non-immigrant visa applicants will now face two additional questions during their visa interviews. The questions are designed to assess whether individuals fear returning to their home countries or have experienced harm or mistreatment there.
According to a report by The Guardian, applicants will be asked: “Have you experienced harm or mistreatment in your home country?” and “Do you fear harm or mistreatment if you return?” Officials indicate that answering “yes” or refusing to respond could significantly increase the likelihood of visa rejection.
Authorities say the move comes amid a surge in asylum claims by foreign nationals entering the United States on temporary visas. By introducing these questions, officials aim to identify individuals who may intend to seek asylum after arrival, rather than return to their home countries as required under non-immigrant visa conditions.
The policy applies broadly across all major non-immigrant visa categories, including tourist, student, business, agricultural, and skilled worker visas such as H-1B. According to official data, approximately 11 million visas were issued in these categories in 2024 alone, indicating the wide-reaching impact of the new rules.
However, legal experts and human rights advocates have expressed serious concerns. They argue that the policy may inadvertently penalize genuine victims of persecution, including those facing domestic violence, threats against journalists, or religious discrimination.
Critics warn that the approach could conflict with international obligations under the United Nations 1951 Refugee Convention, which establishes that the right to seek asylum should not depend on how an individual enters a country or responds during a visa interview.
As the policy takes effect, uncertainty looms for applicants worldwide, many of whom now face a more complex and high-stakes visa process that could hinge on just two answers.
About The Author
